|
Size: 481
Comment:
|
Size: 834
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| ACTA: an illegal treaty? | = ACTA: an illegal treaty? = |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negociate an treaty with much the same content, or even worse. See our ACTA page. | Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures. An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty |
ACTA: an illegal treaty?
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.
An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty
[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch]
[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document]
http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/
http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm