Differences between revisions 3 and 7 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2008-06-07 13:56:59
Size: 481
Editor: AnteWessels
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2008-06-07 14:05:07
Size: 834
Editor: AnteWessels
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
ACTA: an illegal treaty? = ACTA: an illegal treaty? =
Line 3: Line 3:
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negociate an treaty with much the same content, or even worse. See our ACTA page. Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty


ACTA: an illegal treaty?

Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty

[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch]

[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document]

http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/

http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm

acta (last edited 2009-05-30 23:30:40 by localhost)