Differences between revisions 8 and 53 (spanning 45 versions)

ACTA: draft analysis competence issues

Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.

The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis

-  ⇤ ← Revision 8 as of 2008-06-07 14:06:50 → 
  Size: 951
  Editor: AnteWessels
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 53 as of 2008-11-28 22:27:52 → ⇥
  Size: 1695
  Editor: AnteWessels
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 1:
-= ACTA: an illegal treaty? =
+= ACTA: draft analysis competence issues =
 Line 3:
-Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.
+Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.
 Line 5:
-An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty falls within the the EU's competence.
+An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.
 Line 7:
-http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html
+The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis

See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/



[http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_search.cfm?action=search Search Commission documents]

[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=%22133%22&ff_FT_TEXT=acta&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION= Council: 133 (title), acta (text)]


[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION= 
Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in title)]


[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=&ff_FT_TEXT=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION= Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in text)]
-Line 12:
+Line 27:
-[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch]

[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document]

http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/

http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm