|
Size: 951
Comment:
|
Size: 731
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| = ACTA: an illegal treaty? = | = ACTA: draft analysis competence issues = |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures. | Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty falls within the the EU's competence. | An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence. |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html | The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/EU_Competence |
| Line 9: | Line 9: |
[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch] [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document] http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/ http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm |
See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/ |
ACTA: draft analysis competence issues
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.
An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.
The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/EU_Competence
See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/