Differences between revisions 7 and 8

ACTA: an illegal treaty?

Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty falls within the the EU's competence.

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html

[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch]

[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document]

http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/

http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm

-  ⇤ ← Revision 7 as of 2008-06-07 14:05:07 → 
  Size: 834
  Editor: AnteWessels
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 8 as of 2008-06-07 14:06:50 → ⇥
  Size: 951
  Editor: AnteWessels
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 5:
-An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty
+An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the treaty falls within the the EU's competence. 

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html