Size: 785
Comment:
|
← Revision 57 as of 2009-05-30 23:30:40 ⇥
Size: 1785
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
= ACTA: an illegal treaty? = | = ACTA: draft analysis competence issues = |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" treaty is forseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures. | Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [[http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm|European Commission's website]], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures. |
Line 5: | Line 5: |
An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. | An [[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf|ACTA discussion paper]] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence. The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/ |
Line 9: | Line 13: |
[[http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_search.cfm?action=search|Search Commission documents]] [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=%22133%22&ff_FT_TEXT=acta&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION=|Council: 133 (title), acta (text)]] |
|
Line 11: | Line 18: |
[[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION=|Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in title)]] | |
Line 12: | Line 20: |
[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch] | |
Line 14: | Line 21: |
[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document] | [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=&ff_FT_TEXT=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION=|Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in text)]] |
Line 16: | Line 23: |
http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/ | |
Line 18: | Line 24: |
http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm |
[[http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/ContentTopicSummary____34357.aspx|New Zealand]] |
ACTA: draft analysis competence issues
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the European Commission's website, a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.
An ACTA discussion paper was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.
The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis
See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/
Council: 133 (title), acta (text)
Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in title)