|
Size: 731
Comment:
|
← Revision 57 as of 2009-05-30 23:30:40 ⇥
Size: 1785
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures. | Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [[http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm|European Commission's website]], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence. | An [[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf|ACTA discussion paper]] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence. |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/EU_Competence | The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis |
| Line 10: | Line 10: |
[[http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_search.cfm?action=search|Search Commission documents]] [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=%22133%22&ff_FT_TEXT=acta&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION=|Council: 133 (title), acta (text)]] [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION=|Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in title)]] [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=&ff_FT_TEXT=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION=|Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in text)]] [[http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/ContentTopicSummary____34357.aspx|New Zealand]] |
ACTA: draft analysis competence issues
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the European Commission's website, a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.
An ACTA discussion paper was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.
The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis
See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/
Council: 133 (title), acta (text)
Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in title)