Differences between revisions 3 and 50 (spanning 47 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2008-06-07 13:56:59
Size: 481
Editor: AnteWessels
Comment:
Revision 50 as of 2008-11-28 22:22:02
Size: 1392
Editor: AnteWessels
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
ACTA: an illegal treaty? = ACTA: draft analysis competence issues =
Line 3: Line 3:
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negociate an treaty with much the same content, or even worse. See our ACTA page. Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.

The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis

See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/
Line 7: Line 13:
[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch] [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_search.cfm?action=search Search Commission documents]
Line 9: Line 15:
[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document] [http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=%22133%22&ff_FT_TEXT=acta&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION= Council: 133 (title), acta (text)]
Line 11: Line 17:
http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/
Line 13: Line 18:
http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf [http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION=
Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in title)]
Line 15: Line 21:
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm

ACTA: draft analysis competence issues

Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.

The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis

See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/

[http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_search.cfm?action=search Search Commission documents]

[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=%22133%22&ff_FT_TEXT=acta&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION= Council: 133 (title), acta (text)]

[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=anti-counterfeiting+trade+agreement&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_REUNION= Council: anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (in title)]

acta (last edited 2009-05-30 23:30:40 by localhost)