Differences between revisions 3 and 48 (spanning 45 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2008-06-07 13:56:59
Size: 481
Editor: AnteWessels
Comment:
Revision 48 as of 2008-11-28 22:11:51
Size: 832
Editor: AnteWessels
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
ACTA: an illegal treaty? = ACTA: draft analysis competence issues =
Line 3: Line 3:
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negociate an treaty with much the same content, or even worse. See our ACTA page. Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.

The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis

See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/
Line 7: Line 13:
[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1071 Intellectual Property Watch]

[http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf Leaked document]

http://ipjustice.org/wp/campaigns/acta/

http://www.eff.org/issues/acta/acta-submission-032108.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm
[http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_search.cfm?action=search Search Commission documents]

ACTA: draft analysis competence issues

Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). According to the [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/intell_property/fs231007_en.htm European Commission's website], a "path breaking" agreement is foreseen. For this reason the Commission likes to work outside the normal formal structures.

An [http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:Acta.pdf ACTA discussion paper] was leaked. On this page we will discuss whether the agreement, as foreseen in the leaked discussion paper, falls within the the Community's competence.

The analysis moved here: http://action.ffii.org/acta/Analysis

See also: http://action.ffii.org/acta/

[http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_search.cfm?action=search Search Commission documents]

acta (last edited 2009-05-30 23:30:40 by localhost)