|
Size: 28080
Comment:
|
← Revision 255 as of 2009-05-30 23:30:39 ⇥
Size: 13293
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 8: | Line 8: |
| ------ [[[http://www.ipred.org/MainPage|Introduction]]] [[[http://www.ipred.org/analysis|Analysis]]] [[[http://www.ipred.org/howto|How To]]] [[[http://www.ipred.org/factsheet|Fact sheet]]] [[[http://www.ipred.org/download|Downloading]]] |
|
| Line 9: | Line 11: |
| ------ [[http://www.ipred.org/MainPage Introduction]] [[http://www.ipred.org/analysis Analysis]] [[http://www.ipred.org/howto How To]] [[http://www.ipred.org/factsheet Fact sheet]] [[http://www.ipred.org/download Downloading]] ------ | ------ |
| Line 11: | Line 13: |
| = The Criminal Measures IP Directive: Criminalizing the industry = ''The European Commission has proposed a [[http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/532&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en|directive]] to combat piracy and other infringements of "intellectual property rights" (IP-rights), such as patents, copyright and trade marks. While it does make sense to combat clear cases of piracy, it is nonsense to combat other infringements than such clear cases, with criminal measures. These other infringements occur during normal commercial business conduct, civil courts decide on them. The Commission criminalises the industry, inhibits the desired freedom to act in the market. Decent people can be treated as organised criminals.'' |
|
| Line 12: | Line 16: |
| A badly drafted Commission proposal was matched by badly drafted European Parliament amendments, and an amendment changed after the vote. The proposal is now in the hands of the Council. | |
| Line 13: | Line 18: |
| = Legal Affairs Committee washes hands in innocence = | Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negociate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), with much the same content, or even worse. See our [[acta|ACTA]] page. |
| Line 15: | Line 20: |
| The European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee [http://action.ffii.org/ipred2/JURI_Tabled_Amendments voted] on the Criminal Measures IP directive. Overall impression: the experts kept the definitions vague. The experts leave it to the European Court of Justice to clarify the directive. If they want to leave it to the Court, why do they want to be involved in the first place? | ---------- |
| Line 17: | Line 22: |
| It seems to be the new trick in town since the Constitution was voted down: leave it to the Court. Even if the Treaty does not provide enough space, nobody can stop the Court. It has been called a legal coup d'etat here and there. | === Commission withholds key study on criminal measures from European Parliament === * [[http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/Commission_withholds_key_study_on_criminal_measures_from_European_Parliament|Commission withholds key study on criminal measures from European Parliament]] === Official Journal of the European Union publishes corrupted text === ==== Update: In a letter to MEP Eva Lichtenberger, the President of the European Parliament admitted a mistake was made. The text will be corrected. ==== Adopted amendment 15, excluding parallel importation, is not incorporated in the consolidated text. MEP Eva Lichtenberger wrote the President of the European Parliament a letter. |
| Line 19: | Line 28: |
| The approach taken by the Committee will lead to many years of legal uncertainty, a huge threat potential that hampers the freedom to act in the market. Criminal law has to be precise, this age old principle is disregarded by the Committee. | [[http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/100175|Heise has the story.]] |
| Line 21: | Line 30: |
| === Inciting === | [[http://action.ffii.org/ipred2/Mistake_in_EP_provisional_consolidated_text_Criminal_Measures_IP_directive|The FFII has the analysis]] |
| Line 23: | Line 32: |
| The Commission proposal makes inciting an infringement a crime too. This is a huge threat to everybody in the software and the internet industry. From FFII to BSA run amok against this. It is still in. | Despite formal objections raised on 4 December 2007 by MEP and shadow rapporteur Eva Lichtenberger the Official Journal of the European Union published the [[http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/Commission_withholds_key_study_on_criminal_measures_from_European_Parliament|controversial and contested version]]. See the second part of the PR. |
| Line 25: | Line 34: |
| === Piracy === | [[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:074E:0527:0533:EN:PDF|The Official Journal of the European Union]] |
| Line 27: | Line 36: |
| Everybody wants to limit the directive to clear cases of piracy. The [http://www.ip.mpg.de/shared/data/pdf/directive_of_the_european_parliament_and_of_the_council_on_criminal_measures_aimed_at_ensuring_the_enforcement_of_intellectual_property_rights.pdf Max Planck Institute], together with the [http://www.cipa.org.uk/download_files/preliminary_Proposed_Enforcement.pdf Chartered Institute of Patent Agents] gave detailed recommendations to solve this issue. Non of these recommendations made it to the Legal Affairs Committee report. | === Coalition report on the European Parliament vote === Wednesday 25 April 2005. The European Parliament voted on the Criminal Measures IP directive. |
| Line 29: | Line 39: |
| For instance amendment 30: "This Directive lays down the criminal measures necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the context of counterfeiting and piracy." | [[http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/European_Parliament_Criminalises_Businesses,_Consumers,_Innovators|FFII press release]] |
| Line 31: | Line 41: |
| Piracy is not defined. And the formulation can be turned around: These are measures in the context of counterfeiting and piracy, they are very broad, so apparently piracy and counterfeiting have to be seen in a broad way. Like this it only leads to word inflation. How strong is the limitation? The ECJ can even turn a treaty around, as they showed with C-176/03. |
[[http://action.ffii.org/ipred2/Report_on_EP_vote|FFII/BEUC/EBLIDA/EFF Coalition report on the vote]] |
| Line 38: | Line 43: |
| A clear limitation, based on the work of the Max Planck Institute, was overwhelmingly voted down: "For the purposes of this Directive, 'infringement' means an infringement where the infringing item emulates the characteristic elements of a protected product or distinctive sign in an unmodified fashion." |
=== Carte Blanche Criminal Law === Wednesday 25 April 2007 the European Parliament will vote on the Criminal Measures IP directive. |
| Line 42: | Line 46: |
| The importance of this limitation, meant to exclude conflicts over the extent of protection by legitimate commercial enterprises, was not seen by the Committee. | Take action: [[http://www.copycrime.org|www.copycrime.org]] |
| Line 44: | Line 48: |
| === Unexamined rights === | Just prior to the Legal Affairs Committee vote the music industry asked to keep "commercial scale" undefined. They claimed it would be better for reasons of subsidiarity (in this case: leave it to the member states). |
| Line 46: | Line 50: |
| Design rights, which are unexamined, are still in. The Chartered Institute of Patent Agents about them: "The position in relation to registered designs is particularly difficult. It is widely recognised that the effect of having no substantive examination is that there are many designs which are registered which are not valid. If criminal sanctions applied to infringement of such rights then it would seriously impact on the freedom of others to use those designs. Even if it were a defence to show that the registered design was invalid (or that it was believed to be), it is likely that there would be a substantial adverse effect on legitimate competitors, who would not be willing to take the risk of criminal liability. Commercial organisations are willing to take a commercial risk in relation to civil liability – that they will be found liable for damages if their commercial judgement is wrong; but such issues should be left to civil remedies, not to criminal ones." |
Since when does the music industry care about subsidiarity? Earlier they had asked for deletion of the commercial scale condition (as an element of the crime). They would love to see not for profit filesharers in prison. |
| Line 56: | Line 52: |
| Wise words which were not picked up by the Legal Affairs Committee. | [[http://www.ipred.org/april2007|read more]] |
| Line 58: | Line 54: |
| === Commercial scale === | === Legal Affairs Committee washes hands in innocence === The European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee [[http://action.ffii.org/ipred2/JURI_Tabled_Amendments|voted]] on the Criminal Measures IP directive. Overall impression: the experts kept the definitions vague. The experts leave it to the European Court of Justice to clarify the directive. If they want to leave it to the Court, why do they want to be involved in the first place? |
| Line 60: | Line 57: |
| A solid definition of commercial scale by the Max Planck institute was not used: "commercial activity with an intention to earn a profit". The rapporteur invented: "(b) 'infringements on a commercial scale' means any infringement of an intellectual property right committed to obtain a commercial advantage; this would exclude acts carried out by private users for personal and not for profits purposes;" |
[[http://www.ipred.org/legalaffairs07|read more]] |
| Line 65: | Line 59: |
| "This would" shows the origin, a civil law consideration (IPRED). It is weak and not suited for criminal law. = The Prosecution Paradise Directive = All over Europe piracy and counterfeiting of copyright and trademark rights are already prosecutable (TRIPS art 61). The Criminal Measures IP Directive adds disproportionality. The European Commission proposal is not limited to piracy. All commercial scale infringements will be crimes, the proposal criminalises IPR disputes that are essentially of a civil nature and occur between legitimate commercial enterprises. Even untested rights, which may soon evaporate in a civil court cases, become grounds for prosecution. And the rights holders may assist the police. Some Members of the European Parliament even proposed in amendments to remove the "commercial scale" condition or to weaken it, to remove "intentional", to involve consumers, to criminalise the young generation. |
=== The Prosecution Paradise Directive === |
| Line 77: | Line 62: |
| In a knowledge economy, owning information is a certain win. But you still have to fight it out in civil courts sometimes. It is easier and cheaper if the state (the prosecutor) takes care of eliminating competitors, however weak your rights may be, however justified your competitors acts may be. Criminal courts are inexperienced with IP, they will readily provide court orders, criminal law gives wide competences. Litigation companies (trolls) will be able to put maximum pressure on companies that create products and extort disproportional license fees. The current proposals create huge privacy risks when "IP owners" can direct investigation into anyone they accuse of "piracy". | [[http://www.ipred.org/prosecutionparadise|read more]] |
| Line 79: | Line 64: |
| === We do not want our kids to be criminals - just for enjoying a videoclip on YouTube === ==== Legal Affairs committee votes on criminalising downloading ==== Monday Februari 26 and Tuesday Februari 27, 2007, the European Parliament's Legal Affairs committee will discuss and vote on a proposal by Mr Manders, MEP, to [[http://www.ipred.org/download|criminalise downloading]]. |
|
| Line 80: | Line 68: |
| The eighties of the last century were characterised with "get rich fast", it was a poker game. This is worse. Winner takes all, and the others can go to jail, kids included. It's jeopardizing Europe's future. | [[http://action.ffii.org/ipred2/JURI_Tabled_Amendments|The proposal was rejected.]] |
| Line 82: | Line 70: |
| We assume nobody deliberately wants to create a Prosecution Paradise. === Measures to take === 1 Amendments making the directive broader in scope have to be rejected. 2 The crime has to be defined as proposed by the [http://www.ipred.org/art3 Max Planck Institute]. 3 Weak rights have to be taken out of the scope. In fact, only the rights known to be pirated can stay in: copyright and trademark right. 4 Art 7, which allows the rights holders to assist the police, has to be deleted. 5 The criminal measures to combat piracy and counterfeiting are already available. At best, a directive will only have symbolic meaning. A far more realistic approach was suggested by the Dutch Parliament. Its [http://europapoort.eerstekamer.nl/9310000/1/j9tvgajcovz8izf_j9vvgbwoimqf9iv/vg7slw5im1tl?key=vhc0fvdga1qw letter] should be reconsidered. There should be no hesitation to reject the directive. -------------------- [[BR]] = We do not want our kids to be criminals - just for enjoying a videoclip on YouTube = == Legal Affairs committee votes on criminalising downloading == Monday Februari 26 and Tuesday Februari 27, 2007, the European Parliament's Legal Affairs committee will discuss and vote on a proposal by Mr Manders, MEP, to [http://www.ipred.org/download criminalise downloading]. [http://action.ffii.org/ipred2/JURI_Tabled_Amendments The proposal was rejected.] ----------------------------------- [[BR]] |
---------- <<BR>> |
| Line 115: | Line 74: |
| ''The European Commission has proposed a [[http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/532&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en|directive]] to combat piracy and other infringements of "intellectual property rights" (IP-rights), such as patents, copyright and trade marks. While it does make sense to combat clear cases of piracy, it is nonsense to combat other infringements than such clear cases, with criminal measures. These other infringements occur during normal commercial business conduct, civil courts decide on them. The Commission criminalises the industry, inhibits the desired freedom to act in the market. Decent people can be treated as organised criminals.'' | |
| Line 116: | Line 76: |
| ''The European Commission has proposed a [http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/532&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en directive] to combat piracy and other infringements of "intellectual property rights" (IP-rights), such as patents, copyright and trade marks. While it does make sense to combat clear cases of piracy, it is nonsense to combat other infringements than such clear cases, with criminal measures. These other infringements occur during normal commercial business conduct, civil courts decide on them. The Commission criminalises the industry, inhibits the desired freedom to act in the market. Decent people can be treated as organised criminals.'' == Commercial infringements == |
=== Commercial infringements === |
| Line 122: | Line 79: |
| == Bizarre consequences == |
=== Bizarre consequences === |
| Line 126: | Line 82: |
| == Superfluous == |
=== Superfluous === |
| Line 130: | Line 85: |
| == Carte blanche == |
=== Carte blanche === |
| Line 134: | Line 88: |
| == No competence == | === No competence === Interestingly enough, it is the first time the European Union proposes criminal measures, without the member states having a veto. In our opinion, only countries have enough legitimacy to make criminal laws. The Dutch Parliament unanimously concluded the [[http://wiki.ffii.org/IpredNlParl060629En|Commission exceeds its competence]] with this directive. |
| Line 136: | Line 91: |
| Interestingly enough, it is the first time the European Union proposes criminal measures, without the member states having a veto. In our opinion, only countries have enough legitimacy to make criminal laws. The Dutch Parliament unanimously concluded the [http://wiki.ffii.org/IpredNlParl060629En Commission exceeds its competence] with this directive. -------------------------------------------------- |
---------- |
| Line 143: | Line 94: |
| The directive has to be rejected: | |
| Line 144: | Line 96: |
| The directive has to be rejected: | |
| Line 147: | Line 98: |
| Line 152: | Line 102: |
| For conclusion and analysis see our [[http:analysis|analysis page]]. | |
| Line 153: | Line 104: |
| For conclusion and analysis see our [http:analysis analysis page]. ------------------- |
---------- |
| Line 158: | Line 107: |
| Line 167: | Line 115: |
| * [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st08/st08866.en06.pdf|English]] More translations will be available later on. Change "en" twice in the link for translations. |
|
| Line 168: | Line 118: |
| * [http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st08/st08866.en06.pdf English] More translations will be available later on. Change "en" twice in the link for translations. * [http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/fr/06/st08/st08866.fr06.pdf French] * [http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/de/06/st08/st08866.de06.pdf German] * [http://tinyurl.com/9djqm All EU documents on the subject] ------------------------------------------------------- |
* [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/fr/06/st08/st08866.fr06.pdf|French]] * [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/de/06/st08/st08866.de06.pdf|German]] * [[http://tinyurl.com/9djqm|Council documents on the subject]] * [[http://ec.europa.eu/prelex/detail_dossier_real.cfm?CL=en&DosId=193131#381074|Commission]] * [[http://preview.tinyurl.com/ytfdrd|Council Substantive Criminal Law Working Groups' agenda]] * [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=COPEN&dd_DATE_REUNION=|COPEN]] * [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=JAI&dd_DATE_REUNION=|JAI]] * [[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_TITRE=&ff_FT_TEXT=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=DROIPEN&dd_DATE_REUNION=|DROIPEN]] ---------- |
| Line 180: | Line 129: |
| * [[http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/532&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en|Commission announcement]] * The directive is an amended version, [[http://www.ipred.org/history|see the History]] * [[http://www.ip.mpg.de/shared/data/pdf/directive_of_the_european_parliament_and_of_the_council_on_criminal_measures_aimed_at_ensuring_the_enforcement_of_intellectual_property_rights.pdf|Max Planck Institute: Statement on Directive on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights]] ([[http://tinyurl.com/y7yfvh|as tinyurl]]) * [[http://action.ffii.org/ipred2|FFII action page]] * [[http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/secure/file/157008/e:/teamsite-deployed/documents//templatedata/Internet%20Documents/Non-government%20proposals/Documents/ipcriminalsanctions310806.pdf|Comments by the Law Society of Engeland and Wales]] [[http://tinyurl.com/y79cfk|(tinyurl)]] * [[http://europapoort.eerstekamer.nl/9310000/1/j9tvgajcovz8izf_j9vvgbwoimqf9iv/vg7slw5im1tl?key=vhc0fvdga1qw|Dutch Parliament]] * [[http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.9/ipcriminal|EDRI]] * [[http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/ipred2/ipred2.en.html|FSF Europe]] * [[http://c-176-03.blogspot.com/2006/11/european-court-of-justice-crosses.html|European Court of Justice crosses the Rubicon]] * Reinier Bakels presentation for SANE: ISO Open Document Format [[attachment:RBB060517.odp]] PDF [[attachment:RBB060517.pdf]] !PowerPoint [[attachment:RBB060517.ppt]] !OpenOffice.org [[attachment:RBB060517.sxi]] * [[http://www.ipred.org/nl|NL: Gevangenisstraf voor octrooiinbreuk]] * EU News [[http://press.jrc.it/NewsBrief/alertedition/en/JudicialCooperationCriminal.html|Criminal law]] | [[http://press.jrc.it/NewsBrief/alertedition/en/EuropeanConstitution.html|Constitution]] * [[http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/2004/6/21/Councils%20rules%20of%20procedure.pdf|Council rules of procedure]] |
|
| Line 181: | Line 143: |
| * [http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/532&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Commission announcement] * The directive is an amended version, [http://www.ipred.org/history see the History] * [http://www.ip.mpg.de/shared/data/pdf/directive_of_the_european_parliament_and_of_the_council_on_criminal_measures_aimed_at_ensuring_the_enforcement_of_intellectual_property_rights.pdf Max Planck Institute: Statement on Directive on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights] ([http://tinyurl.com/y7yfvh as tinyurl]) * [http://action.ffii.org/ipred2 FFII action page] * [http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/secure/file/157008/e:/teamsite-deployed/documents//templatedata/Internet%20Documents/Non-government%20proposals/Documents/ipcriminalsanctions310806.pdf Comments by the Law Society of Engeland and Wales] [http://tinyurl.com/y79cfk (tinyurl)] * [http://europapoort.eerstekamer.nl/9310000/1/j9tvgajcovz8izf_j9vvgbwoimqf9iv/vg7slw5im1tl?key=vhc0fvdga1qw Dutch Parliament] * [http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.9/ipcriminal EDRI] * [http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/ipred2/ipred2.en.html FSF Europe] * [http://c-176-03.blogspot.com/2006/11/european-court-of-justice-crosses.html European Court of Justice crosses the Rubicon] * Reinier Bakels presentation for SANE: ISO Open Document Format attachment:RBB060517.odp PDF attachment:RBB060517.pdf !PowerPoint attachment:RBB060517.ppt !OpenOffice.org attachment:RBB060517.sxi * [http://www.ipred.org/nl NL: Gevangenisstraf voor octrooiinbreuk] * EU News [http://press.jrc.it/NewsBrief/alertedition/en/JudicialCooperationCriminal.html Criminal law] | [http://press.jrc.it/NewsBrief/alertedition/en/EuropeanConstitution.html Constitution] ------------------- |
---------- |
| Line 200: | Line 146: |
| Line 205: | Line 150: |
| ipred.org is set up by [http://www.vrijschrift.org Vrijschrift.org] [http://wingspan.9cy.com/21.html spring break bodies] | [http://homepage.mac.com/kibbutz1/76.html masturbate to webcams] | [http://miro.wtcsites.com/11.html brunette hand job] | [http://jeremiah.9cy.com/89.html hirsute women websites] | [http://gasolines.envy.nu/25.html sexy blowjobs] | [http://induct.9cy.com/83.html webcam boobs] | [http://unpile.1sweethost.com/50.html wetting pee] | [http://homepage.mac.com/gaiter/2.html interracial sex stories] | [http://overruns.o-f.com/66.html amature florida housewife] | [http://squabbler.bravepages.com/72.html cumming on panties] | [http://homepage.mac.com/canapes/69.html orgy huge tit] | [http://tunisia.00freehost.com/54.html nude bisexual male] | [http://homepage.mac.com/succeed2/43.html spring break boobs] | [http://bullwhip.dreamstation.com/2.html webcam teen orgasm] | [http://vibrating.freewebpages.org/87.html chastity femdom porn] | [http://toothsome.envy.nu/75.html vid samples-angie everheart] | [http://miswrite.wtcsites.com/16.html fat whore webcam] | [http://indued.9cy.com/21.html induced ejaculation] | [http://galosh.bravepages.com/27.html single chat webcam] | [http://concerns.kogaryu.com/59.html michele on webcam] | [http://stacking.1accesshost.com/57.html hairy shooting cum] | [http://sedately.1sweethost.com/11.html latina anal slave] | [http://elfish.ibnsites.com/50.html grand isle webcam] | [http://donal.exactpages.com/36.html philadelphia eagles cheerleaders] | [http://zircons.741.com/77.html celebrity wet pussy] | [http://matings.o-f.com/46.html college teen webcam] | [http://homepage.mac.com/selkirk2/85.html cheyenne indian indusry] | [http://toenail.150m.com/4.html fist lesbian] | [http://homepage.mac.com/domestics/31.html webcam video girls] | [http://tintypes.bravepages.com/65.html squeezing boobs video] | [http://lavaliere.greatnow.com/75.html sexiest female celebrity] | [http://crankiness.100freemb.com/75.html pissing in wood] | [http://homepage.mac.com/exploiter1/29.html bed tanning voyeur] | [http://homepage.mac.com/lube3/54.html amateur webcam girl] | [http://homepage.mac.com/frowningly/40.html anal toys sale] [http://homepage.mac.com/pope4/89.html filipina webcam girl] | [http://rosier.exactpages.com/79.html a womans dick] | [http://solders.freewebsitehosting.com/65.html swallowing female ejaculation] | [http://homepage.mac.com/purchaser8/83.html xxx web cams] | [http://sweetbrier.150m.com/23.html me naked webcam] | [http://teddy.1accesshost.com/85.html strapon fem dom] | [http://homepage.mac.com/whereon/83.html nude horny photo] | [http://brokering.freewebpages.org/77.html nude pregnant girls] | [http://homepage.mac.com/frowningly/22.html fat fucking cocks] | [http://slowness.o-f.com/77.html small tit whore] | [http://fondest.fcpages.com/69.html free bi fucking] | [http://halfcaste.741.com/91.html masturbation party pics] | [http://pewterer.1sweethost.com/86.html kissing cousins necklace] | [http://efficient.100freemb.com/20.html easter 2006 date] | [http://homepage.mac.com/wardroom/60.html cute teen fatties] | [http://superior.ibnsites.com/21.html spring break nude] | [http://estival.exactpages.com/21.html carols creampies] | [http://arboreal.angelcities.com/96.html nude black housewives] | [http://relearn.ibnsites.com/21.html public washroom masturbating] | [http://homepage.mac.com/bearably/2.html free movies insertion] | [http://homepage.mac.com/lubes/51.html wild webcam girls] | [http://homepage.mac.com/rehashed1/32.html milf whore oral] | [http://prowlers.fcpages.com/87.html amatuer webcam girl] | [http://lavaliere.greatnow.com/20.html wife first gangbang] | [http://homepage.mac.com/innervated/62.html reality porn list] | [http://naughts.1accesshost.com/39.html asian panty teen] | [http://homepage.mac.com/draftee/25.html sophmore webcam nude] [http://homepage.mac.com/cryogenic1/76.html teens personal webcam] | [http://arsehole.greatnow.com/68.html thick butt chicks] | [http://homepage.mac.com/fares4/23.html virgin cherry] | [http://homepage.mac.com/apposite1/23.html webcam whores] | [http://homepage.mac.com/anal1/32.html orgasm girl webcam] | [http://mudrooms.dreamstation.com/31.html virgin cunts] | [http://homepage.mac.com/unhandiest/10.html girl webcam movies] | [http://homepage.mac.com/defectives/5.html webcam girl naked] | [http://adorably.greatnow.com/59.html software willing webcam] | [http://leviers.ibnsites.com/2.html live dolphin webcam] | [http://yeshivoth.150m.com/59.html facial toning system] | [http://dredge.wtcsites.com/ cumming in panties] | [http://reliably.ibnsites.com/31.html gang bang thumbnails] | [http://trooped.envy.nu/32.html panty drawer gallery] | [http://homepage.mac.com/clinically/33.html stolen webcam images] | [http://homepage.mac.com/succeed2/32.html panty girl cam] | [http://homepage.mac.com/pope4/67.html adult online webcams] | [http://arboreal.angelcities.com/91.html massive cock suck] | [http://iterated.1accesshost.com/72.html hurricane katarina webcam] | [http://squealer.741.com/62.html nude schoolgirl thumbs] | [http://luminaria.00freehost.com/3.html webcam topless] | [http://homepage.mac.com/passe1/41.html teen webcam galleries] | [http://homepage.mac.com/succeed2/10.html cum shot babes] | [http://trooped.envy.nu/96.html arses galore] | [http://homepage.mac.com/gothically/62.html bum street fights] | [http://diktats.00freehost.com/5.html interacial double penetrations] | [http://extenuated.g0g.net/64.html breast enlargment testimonials] | [http://in.freecities.com/14.html college girls strip] | [http://homepage.mac.com/seedling2/93.html boy bed webcam] | [http://tapelines.kogaryu.com/67.html download sex mpeg] | [http://reenacted.1sweethost.com/31.html webcam upskirt] | [http://upwards.envy.nu/2.html pantie galleries] | [http://defence.1accesshost.com/49.html gay bear twins] | [http://homepage.mac.com/feelings1/11.html webcam cock thumb] | [http://pestled.freewebsitehosting.com/31.html jade celeb nudes] [http://matings.o-f.com/59.html katesplayground webcam photos] | [http://airwomen.fcpages.com/38.html webcam girls online] | [http://headways.angelcities.com/85.html indian pussy] | [http://homepage.mac.com/rumours1/75.html moms lactating nipples] | [http://homepage.mac.com/dentifrice1/82.html yahoo adult webcam] | [http://saran.freewebsitehosting.com/8.html blonde clits gallery] | [http://squad.greatnow.com/2.html asian gay blog] | [http://efficient.100freemb.com/27.html fist fights video] | [http://bullwhip.dreamstation.com/57.html live streaming webcam] | [http://dubois.freecities.com/32.html bisexual mfm] | [http://chipolata.exactpages.com/70.html wives orgasm denial] | [http://homepage.mac.com/roughhewn/55.html webcam girls masturbating] | [http://radiosonde.g0g.net/85.html hentai vidoe pics] | [http://homepage.mac.com/hide94/92.html skinny indian teen] | [http://homepage.mac.com/shoppes/49.html streaming webcam homeage] | [http://homepage.mac.com/keyring/82.html girls webcam shows] | [http://efficient.100freemb.com/76.html japanese schoolgirl uniform] | [http://homepage.mac.com/defectives/41.html masturbating on webcam] | [http://saran.freewebsitehosting.com/62.html artificial vaginas] | [http://publicised.wtcsites.com/49.html blog blow job] | [http://doldrums.freecities.com/17.html group pussy i] | [http://extenuated.g0g.net/38.html bdsm in mississippi] | [http://targets.g0g.net/47.html lingerie models websites] | [http://elfish.ibnsites.com/17.html free porn webcam] | [http://homepage.mac.com/draftee/10.html free girl webcams] | [http://unbars.freecities.com/62.html free webcam websites] | [http://homepage.mac.com/purchaser8/76.html bisexual anal photos] | [http://homepage.mac.com/handicap1/27.html midwest city webcam] | [http://honored.ibnsites.com/73.html bodybuilder cum shots] | [http://shitted.exactpages.com/71.html homemade webcam video] | [http://homepage.mac.com/cruelly/5.html live webcam feed] [http://hermetical.741.com/51.html bi grannies] | [http://bullwhip.dreamstation.com/25.html teen dreams webcam] | [http://istrian.1sweethost.com/13.html lesbian piss shower] | [http://decameter.envy.nu/56.html shemale full videos] | [http://homepage.mac.com/presbyopia/27.html logitech webcam feedback] | [http://gnarling.00freehost.com/2.html amatuer webcam girl] | [http://homepage.mac.com/hadj2/74.html blowjob movie 06] | [http://homepage.mac.com/wisecracks/9.html japanese hentai dvd] | [http://targets.g0g.net/59.html ebony lesbians hardcore] | [http://homepage.mac.com/zip17/2.html webcam hentai] | [http://homepage.mac.com/extortive/28.html horny hand jobs] | [http://amusingly.angelcities.com/82.html shower cam teens] | [http://headbutts.1accesshost.com/72.html accidental cum shot] | [http://graduate.exactpages.com/82.html teen webcam whore] | [http://airwomen.fcpages.com/27.html trisha bathroom webcam] | [http://homepage.mac.com/richard129/88.html goth cam webcam] | [http://homepage.mac.com/regular1/47.html transsexuals in wigs] | [http://efficient.100freemb.com/78.html bdsm hirsute women] | [http://homepage.mac.com/ammeter/29.html sex webcam review] | [http://syllable.ibnsites.com/55.html webcam shower girls] | [http://mephitical.kogaryu.com/75.html videos pornos] | [http://homepage.mac.com/valuably/78.html free adults webcam] | [http://honored.ibnsites.com/10.html interacial gangbangs] | [http://paramecium.100freemb.com/20.html sexy sailor moon] | [http://homepage.mac.com/dilatory/81.html female bodybuilders webcam] | [http://menopausal.greatnow.com/38.html wives masturbating] | [http://balloons.angelcities.com/57.html free lesbian stories] | [http://hightail.exactpages.com/80.html deep mpeg] | [http://homepage.mac.com/marylander1/10.html webcam exibitionist broadcast] | [http://arsehole.greatnow.com/50.html red head nipple] | [http://magritte.freecities.com/79.html amature cheerleader pics] | [http://isotherms.741.com/89.html hentai games apple] | [http://reliably.ibnsites.com/64.html hirsute jpg] | [http://menopausal.greatnow.com/43.html asian sluts nude] | [http://homepage.mac.com/neutrality/53.html adult xxx webcam] | [http://homepage.mac.com/medicaids/82.html webcam capture software] | [http://elfish.ibnsites.com/ capture strip webcam] | [http://pagodas.freewebpages.org/42.html girl on webcams] | [http://hefting.100freemb.com/7.html feminization fem dom] | [http://polyps.741.com/73.html interracial fucks] | [http://homepage.mac.com/exploiter1/54.html adult cartoon scoobee] | [http://vertices.1sweethost.com/93.html lactating lesbo] | [http://spirits.9cy.com/77.html little young pics] | [http://ladybird.100freemb.com/76.html female bodybuilders webcam] | [http://tunisia.00freehost.com/34.html free granny cumshots] | [http://unshaved.envy.nu/40.html hot babes butt] | [http://halfcaste.741.com/75.html teen guy gay] [http://insolently.freewebpages.org/68.html panties under my] | [http://voyageur.exactpages.com/65.html asian hot naked] | [http://deodorized.envy.nu/35.html wc gang bang] | [http://homepage.mac.com/humours/93.html bushy pussy] | [http://bribes.freewebpages.org/70.html webcam little boy] | [http://homepage.mac.com/woodcraft1/64.html fujifilm webcam drivers] | [http://whitehead.9cy.com/43.html college coeds mpeg] | [http://subjection.dreamstation.com/83.html ejaculating vagina] | [http://yeltsin.fcpages.com/54.html knicker shot] | [http://fondest.fcpages.com/6.html uncut gay cock] | [http://homepage.mac.com/counselor4/48.html webcam sites sex] | [http://radiosonde.g0g.net/79.html coed hand jobs] | [http://av.dreamstation.com/21.html virtual reality 09] | [http://infinities.9cy.com/42.html webcam porn movies] | [http://preemies.wtcsites.com/64.html petite red head] | [http://homepage.mac.com/swerving/23.html foxy webcam teen] | [http://pagodas.freewebpages.org/78.html webcam naked] | [http://homepage.mac.com/arks2/78.html naked webcam girls] | [http://vibrator.1sweethost.com/51.html teenage bra models] | [http://lapwing.exactpages.com/69.html briana banks watersports] | [http://umpires.1accesshost.com/9.html shemale gang fuck] | [http://superior.ibnsites.com/25.html horny grannies] | [http://homepage.mac.com/pdq3/42.html peachez 18 webcam] | [http://reuniting.g0g.net/31.html bisexual girls kissing] | [http://homepage.mac.com/marylander1/26.html webcam of cock] | [http://homepage.mac.com/domestics/51.html katesplayground webcam video] | [http://publicised.wtcsites.com/16.html erotic torture] | [http://scrumped.1accesshost.com/51.html webcams teen] | [http://bromidic.g0g.net/48.html webcam bizarre insertion] | [http://precinct.100freemb.com/56.html gang bang girls] | [http://homepage.mac.com/beef5/92.html ass on webcam] | [http://homepage.mac.com/passe1/63.html real peachez webcam] | [http://syllabi.150m.com/53.html boat hand job] | [http://homepage.mac.com/nite1/86.html webcam archives teen] | [http://karin.bravepages.com/15.html gay butthole cumshot] |
ipred.org is set up by [[http://www.vrijschrift.org|Vrijschrift.org]] |
The Criminal Measures IP Directive: Criminalizing the industry
The European Commission has proposed a directive to combat piracy and other infringements of "intellectual property rights" (IP-rights), such as patents, copyright and trade marks. While it does make sense to combat clear cases of piracy, it is nonsense to combat other infringements than such clear cases, with criminal measures. These other infringements occur during normal commercial business conduct, civil courts decide on them. The Commission criminalises the industry, inhibits the desired freedom to act in the market. Decent people can be treated as organised criminals.
A badly drafted Commission proposal was matched by badly drafted European Parliament amendments, and an amendment changed after the vote. The proposal is now in the hands of the Council.
Behind closed doors the EU, US and Japan negociate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), with much the same content, or even worse. See our ACTA page.
Commission withholds key study on criminal measures from European Parliament
Official Journal of the European Union publishes corrupted text
Update: In a letter to MEP Eva Lichtenberger, the President of the European Parliament admitted a mistake was made. The text will be corrected.
Adopted amendment 15, excluding parallel importation, is not incorporated in the consolidated text. MEP Eva Lichtenberger wrote the President of the European Parliament a letter.
Despite formal objections raised on 4 December 2007 by MEP and shadow rapporteur Eva Lichtenberger the Official Journal of the European Union published the controversial and contested version. See the second part of the PR.
The Official Journal of the European Union
Coalition report on the European Parliament vote
Wednesday 25 April 2005. The European Parliament voted on the Criminal Measures IP directive.
FFII/BEUC/EBLIDA/EFF Coalition report on the vote
Carte Blanche Criminal Law
Wednesday 25 April 2007 the European Parliament will vote on the Criminal Measures IP directive.
Take action: www.copycrime.org
Just prior to the Legal Affairs Committee vote the music industry asked to keep "commercial scale" undefined. They claimed it would be better for reasons of subsidiarity (in this case: leave it to the member states).
Since when does the music industry care about subsidiarity? Earlier they had asked for deletion of the commercial scale condition (as an element of the crime). They would love to see not for profit filesharers in prison.
Legal Affairs Committee washes hands in innocence
The European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee voted on the Criminal Measures IP directive. Overall impression: the experts kept the definitions vague. The experts leave it to the European Court of Justice to clarify the directive. If they want to leave it to the Court, why do they want to be involved in the first place?
The Prosecution Paradise Directive
A disproportional directive will cause a Prosecution Paradise, with ample opportunities for trolls.
We do not want our kids to be criminals - just for enjoying a videoclip on YouTube
Legal Affairs committee votes on criminalising downloading
Monday Februari 26 and Tuesday Februari 27, 2007, the European Parliament's Legal Affairs committee will discuss and vote on a proposal by Mr Manders, MEP, to criminalise downloading.
The Criminal Measures IP Directive: European Commission criminalises the industry
The European Commission has proposed a directive to combat piracy and other infringements of "intellectual property rights" (IP-rights), such as patents, copyright and trade marks. While it does make sense to combat clear cases of piracy, it is nonsense to combat other infringements than such clear cases, with criminal measures. These other infringements occur during normal commercial business conduct, civil courts decide on them. The Commission criminalises the industry, inhibits the desired freedom to act in the market. Decent people can be treated as organised criminals.
Commercial infringements
Beyond clear cases of piracy, it is impossible to tell in advance whether an act is an infringement or fair competition. On a daily basis companies try out the boundaries of "IP-rights". Is this product a look alike? Is this copycat or will the patent be invalidated? Is this work an independent recreation? Companies reach agreements or fight it out in civil courts. If a right was indeed infringed, damages are paid. This is a fair process. Adding criminal sanctions to this fair process creates a big threat potential that inhibits the desired freedom to act in the market.
Bizarre consequences
By not making a distinction between piracy and other infringements, the Commission creates bizarre consequences. It is impossible to write software without violating patents. A whole industry will be criminalised. Microsoft has been violating many patents, and had to pay huge damages. With this directive, we could see Bill Gates in prison. Even companies which merely use properly licensed software are criminalised, since such use is intentional, commercial scale and can infringe on software patents. And people who share files on the internet, on a not-for-profit basis, can be treated as organised criminals. You better watch what your kids are doing with your computer.
Superfluous
To combat piracy the legal means are already installed. What is actually needed is better coordination between countries. Copyright "piracy" and trade mark counterfeiting are already crimes throughout the EU, the TRIPS-treaty sees to that. Unlike the directive, the national laws are carefully balanced. With its weak definitions, the directive distorts carefully balanced national procedural law systems.
Carte blanche
An other bizarre aspect of the proposal is that is has an open end: all existing and future "IP-rights" are covered. It is a carte blanche. Seen this misguided, superfluous and outrageous directive, is there anyone who wants to give the Commission carte blanche?
No competence
Interestingly enough, it is the first time the European Union proposes criminal measures, without the member states having a veto. In our opinion, only countries have enough legitimacy to make criminal laws. The Dutch Parliament unanimously concluded the Commission exceeds its competence with this directive.
Conclusion and analysis
The directive has to be rejected:
- it is misguided, superfluous and outrageous
- the Community lacks legitimacy and competence
If not rejected, member states should take the directive to the European Court of Justice.
A complete rewrite could be contemplated. This would result in a directive that does not go any further than the TRIPS treaty. Since we already have the TRIPS treaty, it would not make much sense. While this approach would take away the gross aspects of the directive, it would not solve the competence question.
For conclusion and analysis see our analysis page.
Full name
Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
COM(2006)0168
C6‑0233/2005
2005/0127(COD)
More translations will be available later on. Change "en" twice in the link for translations.
Links
The directive is an amended version, see the History
Max Planck Institute: Statement on Directive on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (as tinyurl)
Reinier Bakels presentation for SANE: ISO Open Document Format RBB060517.odp PDF RBB060517.pdf PowerPoint RBB060517.ppt OpenOffice.org RBB060517.sxi
EU News Criminal law | Constitution
ipred.org
In 2004 the Council and European Parliament adopted an Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED). To make fast adoption possible (before 10 new members joined the EU), criminal penalties were taken out.
The criminal measures are back in the Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights (DCMEIPR ?). This new directive is often called IPRED 2.
ipred.org is set up by Vrijschrift.org